Culture

When Faith Becomes A Marketplace: Why India Needs a Temple Charter

Adithi Gurkar

Sep 11, 2025, 08:00 AM | Updated 11:56 AM IST


Kedarnath Mandir, Uttarakhand.
Kedarnath Mandir, Uttarakhand.
  • How mismanaged temples are turning spiritual journeys into financial ordeals, forcing young devotees to seek government intervention.
  • The helicopter blades whirred overhead as influencer Nikitaa Gupta (known by the handle culturegully on Instagram) waited in the serpentine queue at Kedarnath, watching VIP passengers breeze past toward the temple gates.

    Eight hours later, still standing in the same spot, she began to understand what modern pilgrimage had become: a transaction disguised as devotion.

    “Pay Rs 2,500 for the VIP line, or wait another six hours,” the guide explained matter-of-factly. Inside the temple premises, touts demanded equivalent donations, then insisted on Rs 2,500 per person for mandatory deeksha rituals. Water bottles, basic necessities for exhausted pilgrims, cost Rs 150. The darshan itself lasted barely two minutes.

    By journey’s end, the bill had swelled to Rs 70,000–1,00,000 for what should have been a spiritual experience. The accommodation scam runs deeper: homestays and hostels owned by temple staff deliberately orchestrate helicopter delays, forcing overnight stays that generate additional revenue.

    Her conclusion was damning: “The temple is beautiful, no doubt, but the temple trust makes it a harrowing experience. Wish it comes under government so corruption can stop.”

    This sentiment, once heretical among devout Hindus, now echoes across a generation of young devotees who find themselves trapped between their faith and the extraction machinery that surrounds it.

    Gupta’s experience at Kedarnath represents a systemic transformation of India’s spiritual landscape. Temples, once refuges for the soul-weary, have evolved into elaborate revenue-generating enterprises where every prayer comes with a price tag, every ritual demands additional payment.

    The pattern repeats with nauseating consistency across India’s holiest sites. At Baidyanath Jyotirlinga in Jharkhand, X user Manish Arora documented a harrowing experience that reads like a manual for systematic exploitation.

    His visit to this third jyotirlinga became “probably one of the worst among all temple visits” in his life, revealing a web of extraction that begins the moment pilgrims arrive.

    The shoe storage racket operates with brazen efficiency. Devotees must store footwear at specific shops that force them to purchase “super costly” sweets, with vendors aggressively pushing sales of at least one kilogram.

    General shoe stands have been deliberately eliminated, creating artificial scarcity that feeds this extortion. The queue system itself reveals institutional corruption. While general queues demand six-hour waits, official VIP queues charge Rs 300 per person for three-hour waits. But the real revelation is an illegal shortcut, known exclusively to some staff, that offers the same Rs 300 rate for just one hour of waiting, with payment made directly in cash to avoid any official record.

    The pandit consultation trap ensnares unsuspecting devotees through manufactured helpfulness. “A pandit will start ‘helping’ you without seeking your permission,” Arora explains. “And before you realise, you’re stuck with him as your consultant for this ‘temple run.’ Charges and negotiations and tussles with pandit will happen after everything’s over.” This is a deliberate strategy that prevents pilgrims from making informed decisions about costs until they are already committed.

    The commercialisation reaches absurd heights with sacred thread pricing. Thin threads allegedly lasting three months cost Rs 1,100. Medium thickness for six months demands Rs 2,200. Thick threads for one year command Rs 3,300. These threads, tied across Shiv and Parvati temple structures, represent the commodification of the most basic spiritual symbols. Inside the main temple, a Rs 10 per person cash entry, collected by temple staff with no donation box in sight, grants access to premises filled with trash and empty bottles.

    The physical conditions assault both dignity and devotion. “The entire temple premises is filled with trash and empty water bottles,” Arora observes. “You start to yearn for cleanliness.” The main temple interior was “filthy, slushy and dirty to say the least,” with people “being thrown over each other, pushing and jostling to get darshan of the shivling.”

    This physical degradation mirrors the spiritual decay found across India’s sacred spaces. At Dharmasthala, prasadam used to be poured onto desperately thin leaves that devotees ate off, essentially consuming food from the ground. More recently, there has been a positive shift, with steel plates and sturdy tables and chairs now standard practice.

    Kukke Subramanya features pathways studded with sharp stones, making barefoot pilgrimage an ordeal of physical pain rather than spiritual purification.

    Crowd management, a basic requirement for any public space, remains catastrophically absent. Temples often struggle with devotees literally falling over each other, refusing to maintain respectful distances. The current state of Tiruvannamalai’s temple infrastructure is heartbreaking for any devotee to observe.

    The areas surrounding the revered Arunachaleswara temple, particularly near the main entrances, have deteriorated to an alarming degree, creating significant obstacles for the countless pilgrims who journey there to perform the sacred Girivalam around Lord Arunachala.

    The chaos is not merely about numbers. As one frustrated devotee observes: “I’ve been to concerts with more crowds than this. The problem is authorities not acting responsibly. Temple compounds are too small to handle such crowds. They could create zigzag queues so people get enough time for darshan, plan separate entry and exit gates, and separate lines for men and women. But corruption has eaten up these places.”

    Regular announcements warn against pushing, advise elderly and children to avoid crowds, yet parents continue bringing small children into dangerous situations where “you can literally hear kids cry because they are so small.”

    The spiritual culmination proves most devastating. As Arora reflects: “Everyone around you is trying to pounce on you and extract some money from you in some form. In the end, we came out tired, exhausted and relieved that the ordeal was finally over. Oh! In this stressful process lasting many hours, we forgot to connect and pray with the almighty.”

    This pattern of systematic exploitation extends across the subcontinent, varying only in methodology, not in mercenary intent.

    At Haridwar, many weaponise grief, telling bereaved families that departed souls “will not rest in peace” without expensive pujas. Dwarka’s temple staff perfect the art of guilt-driven donations. The methods differ, but the outcome remains consistent: spiritual seekers leaving temples feeling exploited rather than elevated.

    Source: Tourist Expectation and their Perception towards Service Quality: The case of Baidyanath Dham Jyotirlinga, Deoghar. (Journal of Tourism Insights)
    Source: Tourist Expectation and their Perception towards Service Quality: The case of Baidyanath Dham Jyotirlinga, Deoghar. (Journal of Tourism Insights)

    Manish Arora’s experiential account finds scholarly support in a comprehensive study conducted by researchers at Tezpur University on service quality at Baidyanath Dham Jyotirlinga.

    The analysis used rigorous methodology, rating both expectations and perceptions on a 7-point Likert scale where higher scores indicated more positive ratings. The study reveals systematic failures across multiple dimensions, with tourist expectations consistently exceeding actual service delivery by an overall negative score of -0.616.

    The study’s most damning findings centre on temple services, where expectations (5.52) drastically outpaced perceptions (4.52). The largest service gaps included availability of locker facilities (-3.535), wheelchair accessibility for elderly and disabled visitors (-2.97), proper footwear storage (-2.604), and queue management (-1.446). These measurements validate every frustration documented in Mr Arora’s account.

    Accommodation services showed significant deficiencies, particularly in clean toilet and washroom availability (-0.881) and staff responsiveness (-0.505). The information gap proved equally severe, with tourist expectations (5.58) far exceeding reality (4.05), primarily due to the absence of official guides (-2.465), leaving pilgrims dependent on informal pandas for navigation.

    Safety and security concerns emerged prominently, especially regarding emergency medical facilities (-1.356). While temporary health camps operate during peak seasons, the lack of permanent medical infrastructure poses year-round risks to visitors. Even areas meeting basic expectations, such as transportation and food services, revealed troubling gaps in pricing transparency and hygiene maintenance.

    These findings reflect a broader pattern documented across India’s pilgrimage sites. Research consistently identifies recurring failures: lack of basic hygiene, predatory pricing, emotional manipulation, and the complete absence of crowd management protocols.

    What emerges is a picture of institutions that have forgotten their primary function, which is facilitating spiritual connection rather than financial extraction.

    However, this dismal state is neither universal nor inevitable.

    The dichotomy is not simply between government control and private management. It is between professional administration and exploitative mismanagement.

    Consider the stark contrast with the Naina Devi Shrine in Bilaspur district of Himachal Pradesh, where a similar study yielded dramatically different results.

    Here, pilgrims expressed satisfaction with eleven tourism attributes: availability of transportation facilities, condition of roads and signage, existence of accommodation facilities, food and beverage varieties, quality of food and drink service, helpfulness and cooperativeness of local residents, honesty of shopkeepers and vendors, security of tourist luggage and baggage, safety from mischief and fraud, and availability of medical and first-aid facilities.

    This destination successfully provided these general facilities in an adequate manner, demonstrating that positive pilgrim experiences are achievable when proper attention is paid to service delivery.

    For those who argue that scale poses insurmountable challenges, the Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanam (TTD) stands as a compelling counter-example of how thoughtful administration can restore dignity to sacred spaces regardless of volume. Handling millions of pilgrims annually, TTD has transformed the pilgrimage experience, beginning with a mandatory online booking system that eliminates the chaotic free-for-alls plaguing other temples.

    TTD’s queue management operates with clockwork precision through designated time slots and compartment-based waiting areas. Transparent communication ensures pilgrims know exactly what to expect. General darshan requires 3–6 hours, Special Entry (₹300) takes 2–3 hours, while VIP access is completed within 1–2 hours. This clarity alone represents a revolutionary departure from the uncertainty and exploitation found elsewhere.

    The accommodation infrastructure proves equally remarkable. TTD provides facilities for over 45,000 pilgrims simultaneously, the largest single-location religious accommodation complex in the world. Since 2008, strategic partnerships with private companies such as A.L.L. Services have enabled management of more than 7,800 rooms and dormitories accommodating approximately 10,000 people, with pilgrims able to book accommodations 120 days in advance online and cancel until one day before arrival.

    The physical environment reflects this commitment to excellence. The entire stretch from Tirupati to Tirumala remains “clean, sans litter and garbage” through coordinated manual and mechanised cleaning operations. The holy pond where pilgrims bathe is meticulously maintained, while water treatment systems match five-star hotel standards. Three tertiary treatment plants recycle water for irrigation, and garbage segregation at source enables composting of wet waste as garden manure.

    Most importantly, transparency in pricing remains sacrosanct, a stark contrast to the hidden costs and last-minute extortion that characterise so many other sacred sites.

    Even private management can achieve remarkable results when guided by genuine spiritual purpose. The Somnath temple, ISKCON temples, Birla temples, and BAPS temples (Akshardham) demonstrate this through construction of contemporary amenities, professional maintenance staff, online booking systems for accommodation and temple visits, well-organised darshan timings, crowd flow management, and adequate infrastructure for large gatherings.

    Across these successful models, a common thread emerges. Spiritual authenticity and operational excellence are not mutually exclusive. They are complementary, and dysfunction represents not an inevitable outcome but a deliberate choice between professional management and predatory extraction.

    Global Models

    The solutions exist, tested and proven across religious sites worldwide. Thailand’s Sangha Act illustrates how well-designed institutional coordination can enhance accountability and transparency across 41,000 temples without compromising their spiritual essence.

    This legislative approach demonstrates that oversight need not be destructive when properly implemented. It can actually strengthen religious institutions’ ability to fulfil their sacred purpose.

    Wat Pho serves as a compelling example. It demonstrates how systematic oversight can eliminate donation harassment while maintaining the temple’s sacred character.

    The temple’s fixed pricing structures and digital payment systems create exactly the transparency that could have saved Nikitaa Gupta from her ordeal at Kedarnath. When temples publish clear costs for services and maintain transaction records, the pandit consultation trap simply cannot exist.

    Japan’s Senso-ji temple showcases crowd management that would revolutionise Indian pilgrimage. Receiving over 30 million annual visitors, Senso-ji employs RFID-based staggered entry systems and designated silent darshan hours that allow genuine spiritual engagement rather than the rushed, commercialised encounters plaguing Indian sites. Imagine if Srirangam’s “terrible” conditions could be transformed into orderly queues where devotees actually have time for contemplation rather than survival.

    Protestant churches across Europe and America offer another instructive model through their visitor service standards: trained volunteers who guide visitors respectfully without financial pressure, clear signage in multiple languages, accessible facilities for disabled visitors, and structured programmes that accommodate both casual tourists and serious spiritual seekers.

    However, implementing these standards cannot be solely the responsibility of temple management. It requires cultivating the same civic consciousness among Hindu pilgrims, where devotees take personal responsibility for maintaining temple dignity, following queue discipline, maintaining cleanliness, respecting fellow devotees, and refusing to enable exploitative practices rather than expecting others to manage their behaviour.

    Similarly, Thailand’s broader monastic codes offer frameworks for preventing the emotional blackmail that has become endemic in Indian temples. Certified priest registries and accessible redressal mechanisms could transform relationships. The grief-weaponising pandits of Haridwar would find such tactics difficult under proper ethical oversight systems.

    Even basic infrastructure improvements follow established patterns. Solar-powered walkways, water ATMs, and ISO-certified kitchens can maintain both sanctity and hygiene. These are not revolutionary concepts. They are basic standards that Indian temples have somehow failed to implement.

    A Charter for Spiritual Dignity

    The resistance to reform reveals deeper institutional pathologies. Temple trusts, operating with minimal oversight or fully under government, have developed vested interests in maintaining systems that prioritise revenue over devotee experience.

    While older devotees often accept exploitation as part of spiritual testing, younger pilgrims, raised with service expectations from commercial establishments, cannot understand why places of worship should operate below basic standards.

    The solution requires acknowledging an uncomfortable truth. Many temple trusts, both those under government control and outside, have failed their fundamental responsibility to devotees. A comprehensive Temple Charter, modelled on global best practices, could provide the framework for restoration.

    A comprehensive charter would cut through the institutional rot plaguing India’s sacred spaces, establishing non-negotiable standards that temple trusts can no longer ignore: transparent pricing that ends the pandit consultation trap, certified priest registries that eliminate the grief-weaponising charlatans of Haridwar, crowd management protocols that prevent devotees from literally falling over each other, basic hygiene requirements and accessible complaint mechanisms that give exploited devotees actual recourse.

    The central government could systematically evaluate temples across India using the same rigorous 7-point Likert scale methodology that exposed Baidyanath’s systematic failures, rating both devotee expectations and crushing realities. This could culminate in a public ranking system modelled on Swachh Bharat’s success, creating the kind of public accountability that temple trusts have spent decades avoiding while they transformed spiritual journeys into financial ordeals.

    Core Charter Provisions:

    Pricing Transparency: All temple services, including special darshans and rituals, must display standardised, government-approved pricing. No priest or temple official may demand additional donations beyond posted rates.

    Priest Accountability: Certified registry of all temple priests with training in both spiritual guidance and ethical conduct. Regular evaluations and accessible mechanisms for devotee complaints.

    Crowd Management: Mandatory implementation of staggered entry systems, designated quiet hours, and clearly marked pathways to prevent the chaos that currently characterises many temples.

    Infrastructure Standards: Basic hygiene requirements including clean water access, proper waste management, and maintained walkways. Temples failing to meet standards face suspension of charitable status.

    Spiritual Programming: Mandatory provision of contemplative spaces and educational programmes that serve devotees seeking genuine spiritual engagement rather than rushed commercial encounters.

    The Choice Before Us

    India’s temple institutions face a defining moment. The path forward lies not in choosing between competing models of control, but in recognising that meaningful reform must emerge from within, driven by communities genuinely committed to both spiritual authenticity and operational excellence.

    Young devotees like Nikitaa Gupta should not have to choose between their faith and their dignity, between spiritual seeking and financial exploitation.

    Adithi Gurkar is a staff writer at Swarajya. She is a lawyer with an interest in the intersection of law, politics, and public policy.


    Get Swarajya in your inbox.


    Magazine


    image
    States